You asked if anyone have done this resistance test, the thread I did post did just dropp into my mind...since it was not that long ago.....nothing more than that.

I`m quite shure that more info is found out there somewhere with some searching.

But my impression is that most just changes the sensor, without any extensive testing.

dave you have gone further than the "average punter "in a good and analytical way

and the result ...a win

congradulations ....

we do appreciate inge ,,,he is a mine of all the good things that help us all along the path ...yay inge !

Some K11 sensor readings, different sensor...but same type of element.

charlie99 wrote:we do appreciate inge ,,,he is a mine of all the good things that help us all along the path ...yay inge !

Thanks, Charlie!

I think you are right about most people just changing the sensor without testing.

Still.. no doubt you will remember this as you say as an unusual case.

As for the analytical bit, well my previous job was QA, and before that evaluation technician so I guess I had good training. Pictures always tell a better story in my view.

Thank you both for your input on this Inge and Charlie, very grateful.

Cheers


Dave

Did you see the link at post #53?

Yes I did take a look.

More resistance than 95 but less than 100.